See the evidence before sharing your own chat
Reviewed: September 3, 2026
This page walks through a complete example report generated from an invented conversation. The people, messages, and score are illustrative — not a customer story and not a promise of accuracy.
The fictional conversation
Me: Want to get coffee Friday?
Them: Yes, that sounds fun.
Me: Great — what time works?
Them: Around 6? I can meet near your office.
Interest score: 72 / 100
Positive, with real follow-through. The score weighs reciprocity signals in the excerpt: who initiates, whether questions get answered, how concrete the plans are, and whether both sides invest comparable effort. A short excerpt can only support a cautious reading.
Green flags, tied to evidence
- Concrete logistics: "Around 6? I can meet near your office" proposes a time instead of leaving the plan vague.
- Reciprocal effort: they adapt the location to reduce your friction, which signals investment in the plan.
Red flags
- No red flags found in this excerpt. When an excerpt is this short, the report says so instead of inventing concerns.
Three reply approaches
- Safe: "6 works — see you near the office. Looking forward to it."
- Direct: "6 is perfect. You pick the place this time, I pick next time."
- Bold: "Coffee at 6, and if it goes well you're picking the dinner spot."
What a report cannot tell you
No analysis of pasted text can know what another person feels or predict a relationship. ReadBetween organizes the signals you provide so you can stop rereading the same messages — it is one input for your own judgment, and it is not professional relationship, psychological, or legal advice.
Analyze your own conversation → or read how the analysis works.